LatticeZero
Physics-First Scoring at Screening Speed

Physics-First Molecular Docking & Screening.

Hundreds to thousands of ligands per second on a single GPU — with full physics accuracy and zero trained parameters. No fitted parameters. No training data. No black box. Every term traces back to a physical interaction.

0.916
IsoScreen Mean AUC · 178 targets
R = 0.843
LP+ Abs. Affinity · CASF-2016
ρ = 0.814
LP Screen Rel. Affinity · 87 FEP benchmarks
1,000s
lig/sec · GPU-accelerated

LatticeZero computes physics-first binding interactions at hundreds to thousands of ligands per second on a single GPU. No fitted parameters. No training data. No black box. Every term traces back to a physical interaction.

Everything you need to dock, score, and predict.

A complete molecular docking platform built on physics first principles. Works on any target without calibration. No external dependencies.

Target Prep Automated

Automated receptor preparation. PDB cleanup, protonation, binding site detection, grid generation. Ready in minutes.

Optimizer Supervised

Bring your own labeled data to build custom scoring profiles for your target. Maximizes per-target AUC with cross-validated physics weights. Optional when you have active/decoy labels.

Discrimination Benchmarks

Adaptive geometric filtering matches each pocket's binding regime from population statistics alone. No per-target calibration.

0.897
DUD-E (87 targets)
Industry standard
0.942
DEKOIS 2.0 (76 targets)
Property-matched decoys
0.890
LIT-PCBA (15 targets)
Held-out, real HTS
0.916
Combined (178 targets)
Overall mean

Predict Binding Free Energy from First Principles

Absolute and relative binding affinity from the same physics engine, at screening speed.

Absolute Affinity (LP+)

R = 0.843
CASF-2016 (81 complexes)
MAE = 1.56 kcal/mol
R = 0.84
LatticeZero (ceiling)
MAE = 1.36 kcal/mol
Method CASF-2016 R Speed
LatticeZero 0.843 100s–1,000s lig/sec
RF-Score v3 0.75 ~1,000 lig/sec
FEP+ (AB-FEP) 0.69 hours per molecule
AutoDock Vina 0.60 ~50 lig/sec
Glide SP 0.57 ~100 lig/sec

Relative Affinity (LP Screen) New

Predicts experimental relative binding free energies (ΔΔG) for congeneric ligand series using pocket-geometry adaptive empirical routing.

ρ = 0.814
Mean Spearman ρ
87 public FEP benchmarks
100×
Faster than FEP+
Screening speed, not simulation

Beats or ties industry FEP+ references across Schrödinger, OpenFF, Merck, and JACS benchmarks. Geometry-aware routing automatically selects the optimal physics pathway for each target’s binding pocket.

Methodology

From first-principles physics to GPU-accelerated scoring in four steps.

Step 01
Physics Foundation
First Principles

Scoring grounded in calibrated sterics and electrostatics. No parameters trained on binding data. Every weight traces to a physical interaction term.

Step 02
LP+ Physics Engine
18 Energy Terms

Coulomb, dispersion, repulsion, H-bonds, pi-stacking, burial penalties, strain, and more. All computed from our geometric physics engine.

Step 03
WebGPU Compute
100s–1,000s lig/sec

GPU-accelerated scoring via WebGPU compute shaders. Score hundreds of molecules per second on RTX-series GPUs, directly in the browser.

Step 04
IsoScreen + LP Screen
Adaptive Routing

Pocket-geometry adaptive empirical routing — the docked ensemble reveals the pocket's binding regime and automatically routes each prediction through the most accurate physics formula. Zero calibration required.

What Makes This Different

Physics-first scoring on GPU

Coulomb, dispersion, repulsion, strain, and hydrogen bond geometry computed per atom pair at hundreds to thousands of ligands per second on a single GPU. Not parameterized force fields. Not learned potentials. Computed from atomic coordinates and partial charges.

Pocket-geometry adaptive empirical routing

Population statistics of the docked ensemble reveal the pocket's binding regime. The optimal physics formula is selected automatically. Rigid pockets, flexible grooves, metal sites, allosteric cavities: each gets the physics it needs.

Absolute + relative affinity from the same physics engine

The same physics engine that discriminates actives from decoys also predicts absolute binding free energy (R = 0.843, CASF-2016) and relative affinity (ρ = 0.814, 87 FEP benchmarks). Screening, ranking, and affinity in one platform.

Works on any target without calibration

No training set required. No active/decoy labels needed. Upload a receptor PDB and a ligand library. Score in minutes.

Problems We Solve

Empirical overfitting

Physics-derived scoring grounded in calibrated sterics and electrostatics. No parameters trained on binding data. No decoy bias.

Steric clashes

Docking-calibrated softening derived from potential matching, not AUC optimization. Reduces clash artifacts while preserving pose discrimination.

Requires per-target training

Most ML scoring functions need active/decoy labels for every new target. IsoScreen scores any target with zero calibration - docking strain and physics terms determine the scoring pathway automatically.

Black-box predictions

Every score traces to interpretable physics terms. Coulomb, dispersion, repulsion, H-bonds, burial - all inspectable. No neural network hidden layers.

Get Early Access

Full platform access during open beta. No credit card required.

Enterprise
By Inquiry
  • Custom scoring profiles with labeled data
  • Priority support
  • Dedicated infrastructure
  • SLA & integration
Contact Us

Try It Now